- Home
- Advanced Search
- Search Tips
- Media Repository
- About Us
- Executive Summary
- Using DNA to Solve Crimes
- Using DNA to Protect the Innocent
- Using DNA To Identify Missing Persons
- Funding Requested Under the Initiative
- Working Group Membership
- DNA Initiative Meeting Transcripts
- March 4, 2002 Meeting
- Participants and Speakers (transcript)
- Welcoming, Opening Remarks, and Goals and Objectives of AGID-LAB (transcript)
- Introduction of Working Group Members and NIJ Staff (transcript)
- DNA Analysis Backlogs (transcript)
- CODIS Architecture Redesign Plan (transcript)
- Advancements in DNA Technology (transcript)
- State and Local Laboratory Perspective (transcript)
- NIJ Backlog Reduction Programs (transcript)
- Planning Session (transcript)
- Closing Remarks (transcript)
- October 21, 2002 Meeting
- Welcoming, Introductions, and Opening Remarks (transcript)
- South African Police Service Forensic Science Laboratory (transcript)
- Discussion of Automated Forensic DNA Analysis (transcript)
- Mitochondrial DNA Analysis (transcript)
- Public Comment (transcript)
- Postconviction DNA Testing (transcript)
- Closing Remarks (transcript)
- October 22, 2002 Meeting
- Opening Remarks (transcript)
- Forensic Resource Network (transcript)
- Transforming Practice Through Competency Building (transcript)
- Developing a Resource Guide (transcript)
- Addressing the Shortage of Qualified Laboratory Analysts (transcript)
- Other Discussion Items (transcript)
- NIJ-Supported Research (transcript)
- DNA Databases (transcript)
- Legislative and Policy Issues (transcript)
- Federal Funding for DNA Analysis—Issues and Priorities (transcript)
- Using DNA to Identify Unidentified Dead Bodies (transcript)
- International DNA Analysis (transcript)
- Elevating Forensic Tools Other Than DNA (transcript)
- Closing Remarks (transcript)
- March 4, 2002 Meeting
- Grant Funding
- Forensic DNA Backlog Reduction
- Program Requirements
- How Funding Is Allocated
- How You Can Use Funds
- Results and Reporting
- Program Legislation
- Backlog Reduction Awards: FY 2007
- Forensic DNA Capacity Enhancement Awards: 2004 - 2006
- Forensic Casework Backlog Reduction Awards: 2004 - 2006
- Restrictions on Access to Award Funds in Certain Circumstances
- Convicted Offender/Arrestee DNA Backlog Reduction
- Forensic DNA Research and Development Funding
- Solving Cold Cases With DNA
- Forensic Science Training Development and Delivery Program
- Forensic DNA Laboratory Capacity Enhancement Program
- Forensic Casework DNA Backlog Reduction
- Other Related Grant Funding
- Forensic DNA Backlog Reduction
- Training
- Forgot your password?
- Request Received
- Regional Cold Case Training
- Thank you for your interest
- Online Training
- Onsite Training
- Training Resources
- DNA Analyst Training Program
- DNA: A Prosecutor's Practice Notebook
- What Every Law Enforcement Officer Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Principles of Forensic DNA for Officers of the Court
- Crime Scene and DNA Basics for Forensic Analysts
- Hair Evaluation for DNA Analysis
- Laboratory Orientation and Testing of Body Fluids and Tissues for Forensic Analysts
- DNA Extraction and Quantitation for Forensic Analysts
- DNA Amplification for Forensic Analysts
- Amplified DNA Product Separation for Forensic Analysts
- STR Data Analysis and Interpretation for Forensic Analysts
- Population Genetics & Statistics for Forensic Analysts
- Communication Skills, Report Writing, and Courtroom Testimony for Forensic Analysts
- Non-STR DNA Markers: SNPs, Y-STRs, LCN and mtDNA
- Advanced and Emerging DNA Techniques and Technologies
- Laboratory Safety Programs
- Statistics
- Research
- Research Articles from NIJ-Funded Research
- New Research and Development Awards, 2006
- General Research References
- Forensic DNA Technology Working Group
- Human DNA Quantitation
- Y Chromosome
- Compromised DNA Evidence
- Mitochondrial DNA
- Miniaturization and Automation
- General Tools and Information
- Non-Human DNA
- Alternative Genetic Markers
- Sperm Detection and Separation
- Research by NIST Human Identity Lab
- Publications
- In the News
- About Forensic DNA
- Uses of Forensic DNA
- Forensic DNA Databases
- Solving Crimes
- Solving Cold Cases
- Solving Property Crimes
- DNA and Wildlife Forensics
- Identifying Persons and Victims
- Identifying Missing Persons
- National Missing and Unidentified Persons System
- Statistics on the Unidentified Dead
- DNA Reference Kits
- Analysis of Remains and Biological Samples
- Educational Material for Families
- Training and Assistance
- Research, Development, and Testing
- Identifying Persons and Victims Home
- DNA Projects Target Missing Persons Cases
- Publications
- Identification in Mass Fatality Incidents
- Identifying Missing Persons
- Postconviction Testing
- Roles and Recommendations for Prosecutors
- Roles and Recommendations for Defense
- Roles and Recommendations for the Judiciary
- Role of Law Enforcement
- Roles and Recommendations for Laboratory Personnel
- Roles and Recommendations for Victims' Advocates
- Postconviction DNA Testing: Recommendations for Handling Requests
- Background on DNA Testing
- Framework for Analysis
- The Roles of Participants
- Legal Issues
- The Impact of DNA Testing
- Can a Right to Discovery be Inferred From Statutes?
- Is There a Constitutional Right to Testing Under the Brady Doctrine?
- Access to Testing Through Habeas Corpus Review
- Other Bases to Obtain Access to Testing
- What Kind of Showing Must the Petitioner Make to be Afforded Access to Testing
- May Consensual Partners Be Required to Provide Elimination Samples?
- Time Limits
- Is a Petitioner Entitled to Testing in Order to Pursue Executive Clemency if the Results are Favorable?
- Is an Indigent Petitioner Entitled to Have the State Pay for Postconviction DNA Testing?
- Inmate Compensation
- Biological Issues
- Types of Samples Suitable for DNA Testing
- Storage and Preservation of Samples
- Determination of the Age of the Sample
- Determining Which Samples to Test
- Testing of Samples Deposited on Various Substrates
- Previous Testing: Was It Done? What Do the Tests Mean?
- Possible Results From DNA Tests
- Location of Samples in Postconviction Cases
- Recommendations for Prosecutors
- Recommendations for Defense Counsel
- Recommendations for the Judiciary
- Recommendations for Victim Assistance
- Recommendations for Laboratory Personnel
- Survey of Postconviction Statutes
- Summary of Postconviction DNA Motions
- Postconviction Issues Working Group
- Back to "Uses of Forensic DNA"
- Solving Cold Cases
- Regional Cold Case Training
- Back to "Uses of Forensic DNA"
- Using DNA to Solve Cold Cases: Practical Guidance
- Identification in Mass Fatality Incidents
- Identifying Missing Persons
- Solving Property Crimes
- Tools for Forensic Scientists
- State Profiles
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- State-by-State Template NOT FOR PUBLIC
- Services for Laboratories
- DNA Sample Analysis
- DNA Laboratory Audits and Accreditation
- DNA Sample Collection Kits
- Quality Documents
- NIJ Expert Systems Testbed Project
- Sequencing Unusual STR Alleles
- Validation Information for Labs
- Compilation and Management of U.S. Y-STR Reference Database
- Quality Assurance Standards for Forensic DNA Testing Laboratories (FBI)
- Statutes and Case Law
- Statutes and Case Law
- Glossary
- Case Studies on the Uses of Forensic DNA
- DNA Captures "Night Stalker"
- DNA From Ligature Solves Rape Case
- A Lifetime Struggle: The Courage of Kellie Green
- A First Step Toward Healing: Crime Victim Debbie Smith's Story
- DNA Database Solves Rape at University of Virginia
- Preventable Crimes
- Preventable Crimes in Alaska
- Preventable Crimes in Arkansas
- Preventable Crimes in California
- Preventable Crimes in Hawaii
- Preventable Crimes in Idaho
- Preventable Crimes in Indiana
- Preventable Crimes in Kentucky
- Preventable Crimes in Louisiana
- Preventable Crimes in Massachusetts
- Preventable Crimes in Missouri
- Preventable Crimes in Nebraska
- Preventable Crimes in New Jersey
- Preventable Crimes in New York
- Preventable Crimes in North Carolina
- Preventable Crimes in North Dakota
- Preventable Crimes in Ohio
- Preventable Crimes in Pennsylvania
- Preventable Crimes in Rhode Island
- Preventable Crimes in South Carolina
- Preventable Crime Case Study Assumptions
- Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science
- Gilbert Alejandro
- Kirk Bloodsworth
- Mark Diaz Bravo
- Dale Brison
- Ronnie Bullock
- Leonard Callace
- Terry Leon Chalmers
- Ronald Cotton
- Rolando Cruz and Alejandro Hernandez
- Charles Dabbs
- Gerald Wayne Davis
- Gary Dotson
- Frederick Rene Daye
- Edward Green
- Ricky Hammond
- William O'Dell Harris
- Edward Honaker
- Joe C. Jones
- Kerry Kotler
- Steven Linscott
- Bruce Nelson
- Brian Piszczek
- Dwayne Scruggs
- David Shephard
- Walter Snyder
- David Vasquez
- Glen Woodall
- Other Resources for DNA Information
- More Information
- Browse by Audience
- Officers/ Investigators
- Forensic Scientists
- Officers of the Court
- Crime Lab Managers
- Researchers
- Policymakers and Lawmakers
- Victim Advocates
